In particular, it can't batch-scan (scan multiple photos at once and put each in a separate file), and it doesn't include options for either scratch removal or color restoration for faded photos. All of these are increasingly common features, even on inexpensive flatbed scanners. On the plus side, the claimed 1,600-pixel-per-inch (ppi) optical resolution is more than enough for a scanner that doesn't scan transparencies (slides and film). Even if you crop your scans substantially or print them at a larger size than the original, 1,600 ppi leaves plenty of headroom beyond the resolution you'll actually need. The A320 comes with a reasonably easy-to-use utility for defining the scan setting for each button on the scanner. In addition, Twain and WIA drivers let you scan from most Windows programs with a scan command, and the software bundle includes a photo editor (NewSoft Presto! Image Folio 4.5), an optical character recognition (OCR) program (Abbyy FineReader Sprint Plus 6.0), and a document management program (NewSoft Presto! PageManager 7.1).ĭespite the included photo-editing software, the A320 is not a good choice for scanning photos. Beyond the lack of scratch removal, color restore, and batch-scan features that I mentioned earlier, its photo scan quality simply wasn't very impressive on my tests. ![]() Scanned images viewed at 100 percent size onscreen had a slightly hazy look, as if shot through gauze. ![]() Viewed at larger sizes, dark backgrounds broke apart into red, green, and blue pixels, which show as noise on images printed at the same size as the originals. Overall, the quality was good enough for scanning and reprinting photos to hand out as snapshots to friends and family or include in, say, a client newsletter. It was not good enough to satisfy a serious photographer. The good news about the A320 is that it scores well on office tasks like optical character recognition (OCR) and document management. ![]() On our tests, it read both Times New Roman and Arial fonts at sizes as small as 8 points without a mistake.Īlthough its overall score for OCR is held down by the lack of an automatic document feeder (ADF), it did a good job on the actual task of recognizing text.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |